Sections 20–29 · synthetic model → deterministic governance
FDE-AIQOS — AI & Quantum Operating System
Data centre → data → applications → knowledge → AI/ML → agentic AI → quantum intelligence → nudge and assist → deterministic governance → human decision → audit → neural feedback. Every layer independently observable, every number generated offline.
$ python -m fde_toolkit aiqos --count 500 --export audit.jsonl
20 · Synthetic data model
500 events · seed fde-aiqos-2026 · no real customer data
Events
500
Allow
323
Review
137
Reject / isolate
40
Mean risk
0.300
| Field | Unit | Distribution | Normal band |
|---|---|---|---|
| cpu_pct | % | normal(62, 18) clipped 5..99 | < 80 |
| memory_pct | % | normal(68, 16) clipped 10..99 | < 85 |
| network_pct | % | normal(42, 20) clipped 1..99 | < 75 |
| latency_ms | ms | lognormal(ln 95, 0.45) clipped 15..1200 | < 250 |
| error_rate_pct | % | beta(1.5, 18) × 8 | < 1.5 |
| packet_loss_pct | % | beta(1.2, 25) × 3 | < 0.5 |
| temperature_c | °C | normal(58, 8) clipped 30..90 | < 70 |
Normal
Risk below 0.55, KYC verified, retrieval grounded, no structural breach.
execute and audit
Review
Risk at or above 0.55, KYC pending or expired, or retrieval relevance below 0.45.
human-in-the-loop queue
Reject / isolate
Velocity > 0.85, ethics linkage < 0.35, sanctions hit, or value ≥ 10 000 without dual approval.
block, isolate, escalate
20a · Resource and risk distributions
500 events · histogram counts per band
CPU utilisation
%
mean 62.2 · p50 62.2 · p95 91.1 · max 99.0
Memory utilisation
%
mean 68.1 · p50 68.1 · p95 94.1 · max 99.0
Network utilisation
%
mean 43.9 · p50 43.7 · p95 75.5 · max 99.0
Latency
ms
mean 104.9 · p50 94.5 · p95 203.7 · max 316.5
Deterministic risk
0..1
mean 30.0 · p50 29.8 · p95 38.0 · max 42.8
Transaction value
lognormal(ln 1 800, 1.1) · dual-approval threshold at $10k
20b · KYC, PEP and sanctions rates
population share per control flag
| Control flag | Count | Rate |
|---|---|---|
| KYC verified | 412 | 82.4% |
| KYC pending | 58 | 11.6% |
| KYC expired | 30 | 6.0% |
| PEP flagged | 17 | 3.4% |
| Sanctions hit | 10 | 2.0% |
| Dual approval present | 117 | 23.4% |
| Invoice evidence present | 52 | 10.4% |
| Weak grounding (RAG < 0.45) | 77 | 15.4% |
20c · Q-LOCK gate counts
allow / review / reject-isolate, split by domain
21 · Example synthetic function output
same inputs, same output — always
OntologyMapper
TBL_CUST_99X_REV
↓
Customer
↓
confidence = 0.99Above the 0.95 auto-accept threshold; below it the mapping goes to a steward.
ToolSynthesizer
POST /payments
↓
create_payment
↓
HIGH RISKWrite scope exposed only with payments.write plus a human approval step.
IntentRouter
"What is our exposure?"
↓
Compliance / Graph Agent
↓
confidence = 0.94Specialist route: 22× cheaper and 4× faster than the frontier fallback.
RAGRetriever
"EDD refresh policy"
↓
Sentence chunk #4
↓
hybrid score = 0.5020.6 dense + 0.4 keyword, then metadata and permission filters.
PolicyEngine
TXN-10021
↓
ALLOW
↓
0 rules matchedAn allow is still an audited decision, not silence.
PolicyEngine
TXN-20051 · $50M shell beneficiary
↓
V1 + V4 breachDeterministic gate overrides a 0.97-confidence model proposal.
22 · Full enterprise inference pipeline
┌─────────────┐
│ USER / EVENT│
└──────┬──────┘
↓
Intent Detection
↓
Risk Classification
↓
┌──────┴──────┐
↓ ↓
SLM path LLM path
│ │
└──────┬──────┘
↓
Context Builder
↓
┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
RAG Graph DB Memory
│ │ │
└──────────────┼──────────────┘
↓
Agent Planner
↓
DAG/ReAct
↓
MCP Tools
↓
AI/ML Inference
↓
Quantum Signal
↓
AI Insights
↓
AI Nudge
↓
POLICY/Q-LOCK
↓
┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
ALLOW REVIEW DENY
↓ ↓ ↓
Execute Human HITL Isolate
└──────────────┼──────────────┘
↓
AUDIT
↓
OUTCOME DATA
↓
NEURAL FEEDBACK
↓
MODEL/EVAL UPDATEStage by stage
what each stage owns and emits
| Stage | Responsibility | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Intent detection | Classify what the request actually is before spending a token. | intent + confidence |
| Risk classification | Decide the blast radius: read, advisory or state-changing. | low / medium / high |
| SLM vs LLM path | Cheap specialist by default; frontier model only when it earns it. | route + cost |
| Context builder | Assemble permission-filtered context under a token budget. | context pack |
| RAG / graph / memory | Documents, relationships and prior decisions in parallel. | evidence set |
| Agent planner | Decompose into a DAG or run a ReAct loop for exploratory work. | plan |
| MCP tools | Scope-gated tool descriptors; writes need approval. | tool calls |
| AI/ML inference | Behavioural, anomaly and ranking models score the case. | scores |
| Quantum signal | QFT spectral view and QSVM candidate classification. | safe / unsafe |
| AI insight | Drivers, network context and evidence — not an adjective. | explanation |
| AI nudge | The next best action, offered before the mistake is made. | recommendation |
| Policy / Q-LOCK | Deterministic deny-overrides gate above every model. | ALLOW / REVIEW / DENY |
| Execute / HITL / isolate | Three terminal paths, all of them logged. | action |
| Audit | Hashed, ordered, append-only, regulator-replayable. | evidence |
| Neural feedback | Outcomes and overrides become the next eval set. | model + policy update |
23 · Use-case matrix
✓ intensity per capability
| Sector | Use case | RAG | Graph | Agent | Quantum / AI | Q-LOCK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banking | AML investigation | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Banking | KYC investigation | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Insurance | Claims fraud | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Data centre | Predictive operations | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ |
| Telecom | Network anomaly | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ |
| Trade finance | Invoice / party risk | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Healthcare | Clinical document intelligence | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Manufacturing | Predictive maintenance | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ |
| Logistics | Route optimisation | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ / QAOA | ✓ |
| Government | Case management | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ |
24 · Banking / AML demonstration
one question, ten hops, one gate
“Investigate CUST-4412 and determine whether the latest payment should be released.”
- 01CUST-4412case opened from the payment request
- 02KYCidentity refreshed 14 months ago — EDD window breached
- 03Transactionsvelocity +184% versus the 90-day baseline
- 04Counterparties95% concentration into a single beneficiary
- 05UBO graphtwo hops from a previously flagged entity
- 06Sanctionsno direct hit; adverse-media proximity flagged
- 07RAG policy3 policy documents support enhanced review
- 08Behavioural modelrisk 0.87 · confidence 0.94
- 09Quantum candidate classifierUNSAFE side of the QSVM margin
- 10Q-LOCKdeterministic gate evaluated last
{
"customer": "CUST-4412",
"risk_score": 0.87,
"rag_grounding": 0.91,
"graph_risk": 0.84,
"model_confidence": 0.94,
"quantum_classifier": "UNSAFE",
"policy": "DENY",
"q_lock": "REJECT_ISOLATE",
"human_review": true
}25 · AI insight output
not an adjective — drivers, network, evidence
Instead of “Transaction appears risky.” the platform produces:
Primary drivers
- 1. Velocity +184% versus 90-day baseline
- 2. Counterparty concentration = 95%
- 3. Weak provenance = 0.31
- 4. Beneficiary KYC linkage incomplete
- 5. Invoice evidence absent
Network insight
Counterparty is two hops from a previously flagged entity.
RAG evidence
3 policy documents support enhanced review.
Recommended action
BLOCK → INVESTIGATE → HUMAN APPROVAL
This is the difference between a chatbot and an enterprise cognitive operating system.
26 · AI assist vs AI nudge vs agent
capability, risk and approval surface
| Capability | AI assist | AI nudge | Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Explain | Strong | Medium | Strong |
| Recommend | Medium | Strong | Strong |
| Execute | No | Usually no | Yes |
| Human approval | Yes | Yes | Policy-dependent |
| Context | RAG / memory | Real-time telemetry | Full context |
| Risk | Low | Medium | High |
| Audit | Required | Required | Mandatory |
27 · Audit architecture
attribution · ordering · immutability
- ┌Agent Event
- │Policy Event
- │Tool Event
- │Human Event
- │Decision Event
- │Hash
- │Append-only Audit Store
- │SIEM
- │GRC
- └Regulatory Replay
{
"actor": "agent",
"event": "payment.request",
"transaction": "TXN-SYN-20051",
"model": "risk-model-v12",
"confidence": 0.97,
"policy": "AML-POLICY-v18",
"q_lock": "REJECT_ISOLATE",
"reason": [
"V1_velocity",
"V4_ethics"
],
"human_review": true
}Generated audit trail
500 records · first 8 shown
{"actor":"agent","event":"infra.telemetry","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20000","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.83,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"ALLOW","reason":["none"],"human_review":false}
{"actor":"policy","event":"application.action","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20001","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.93,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"ALLOW","reason":["none"],"human_review":false}
{"actor":"tool","event":"payment.request","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20002","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.55,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"ALLOW","reason":["none"],"human_review":false}
{"actor":"human","event":"payment.request","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20003","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.69,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"ALLOW","reason":["none"],"human_review":false}
{"actor":"agent","event":"infra.telemetry","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20004","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.84,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"REVIEW","reason":["kyc_expired"],"human_review":true}
{"actor":"policy","event":"infra.telemetry","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20005","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.89,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"REJECT_ISOLATE","reason":["no_dual_approval","weak_grounding"],"human_review":true}
{"actor":"tool","event":"payment.request","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20006","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.8,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"REVIEW","reason":["kyc_pending"],"human_review":true}
{"actor":"human","event":"payment.request","transaction":"TXN-SYN-20007","model":"risk-model-v12","confidence":0.83,"policy":"AML-POLICY-v18","q_lock":"ALLOW","reason":["none"],"human_review":false}28 · Simulator workbook contents
offline, regenerable from the CLI
| Sheet | Contents |
|---|---|
| README | What the workbook is, how it was generated and the offline guarantee. |
| Architecture | The ten-layer FDE-AIQOS stack with components and outputs. |
| Module Map | Capability map across the fourteen modules. |
| Function Outputs | Deterministic function traces per module. |
| Synthetic Data | 500 enterprise records — data centre, business and AI fields. |
| 140 MCQs | Ten technology questions per module with answer keys. |
| Simulator Logic | Every formula and gate used by the simulators. |
Regenerate everything with python -m fde_toolkit aiqos --workbook out.xlsx (CSV fallback when no spreadsheet library is present) or --export audit.jsonl.
29 · Recommended next-generation architecture
FDE-AIQOS
FDE-AIQOS
│
┌───────────────┼────────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
OBSERVE UNDERSTAND ACT
│ │ │
Data Center Ontology Agents
Business Data RAG MCP
Applications Graph DAG
Networks Memory ReAct
│ │ │
└───────────────┼────────────────┘
↓
AI INFERENCE
↓
Neural / SLM / LLM
↓
Quantum Candidates
↓
AI INSIGHTS
↓
AI NUDGES
↓
DETERMINISTIC Q-LOCK
↓
┌─────────┼─────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
ALLOW REVIEW DENY
└─────────┼─────────┘
↓
AUDIT
↓
NEURAL FEEDBACK
↓
CONTINUOUS LEARNINGRAG, vector search, graphs, memory, agents, SLMs, LLMs and quantum models are intelligence components. They are not the final authority for high-impact enterprise actions: policy, permissions, deterministic controls, human approval and audit sit above them.
Layer map
each layer independently observable and deployable
L0
Data centre
Servers, GPUs, storage, network, Kubernetes, power and cooling
→ Telemetry, logs, traces, metrics
L1
Business data
Customers, accounts, transactions, invoices, KYC, risk, exposure
→ Structured records and documents
L2
Applications
APIs, CRM, core banking, ERP, payment rails, workflow systems
→ Events, API calls, business state
L3
Data pipelines
CDC, batch and stream, schema registry, data quality, lineage
→ Canonical enterprise events
L4
Knowledge fabric
Vector DB, knowledge graph, network graph, metadata and provenance
→ Retrieval context and relationships
L5
AI / ML fabric
SLM and LLM, classifiers, anomaly detection, time series, GNN, ranking
→ Predictions, embeddings, scores
L6
Agent runtime
Intent router, ReAct, DAG, MCP tools, tiered memory
→ Plans, tool calls, observations
L7
Policy and quantum
OPA/Rego, deterministic Q-LOCK, hybrid QSVM/QAOA experiments
→ Allow / deny / escalate and optimisation
L8
Human control
AI assist, AI nudge, review queues, approvals, explainability
→ Human decision or override
L9
Audit and feedback
Immutable audit, evaluation, drift, telemetry, retro
→ Evidence plus model and policy improvement
